The main difference is because of the strong open source community, Nginx has a lot more free setup scripts than Litespeed. Nothing could be further from the truth, any web server is either going to require you to understand the basics of configuration or hire someone (or a web host) to manage that server for you on your behalf. Nginx because it seems there is a coordinated effort to confuse WordPress users while making them believe Litespeed is a magic fix to all of their web technology problems and confusion. ![]() The truth is that there are several free WordPress plugins that allow you to clear/purge the Nginx FastCGI cache… however some Nginx users don’t use these, and simply configure auto-clearing rules in their FastCGI cache configuration.Īgain, there are so many rumors going around about Litespeed vs. What makes it even weirder is the Litespeed affiliates go around web forums saying things like “Nginx is so difficult to configure, they don’t even have a plugin for WordPress” which apparently is designed to scare less tech-savvy users away from trying Nginx. htaccess files can be removed from Openlitespeed if you prefer (or edited in a central location instead of per-user files) but again they seem to be catering to the WordPress and shared hosting industry i.e. Openlitespeed does have server-level caching (Apache and Nginx do too of course) but it seems the vast majority of Litespeed users are not aware of this and rely on the provided free WordPress plugin “LS Cache”. Good questions, my conclusion is that Litespeed Tech has decided going after the WordPress community is the easiest target (probably because the users are considered less tech-savvy). There appears to be a coordinated “marketing” campaign between Litespeed Tech and some of their bloggers/affiliates to distribute the same misleading benchmarks where Nginx FastCGI was disabled during the tests resulting in Litespeed appearing to be much faster: Why the bloated WP cache plugins are still so common? htaccess files)… isn’t that really the better comparison with Nginx? htaccess files which are very insecure and can be hacked by WordPress plugins.Īnd why do every Litespeed hosting company use cPanel? If they want to be lightweight and secure like Nginx than why is no web host using OpenLitespeed + (no WP cache plugin) + (no. ![]() Here is what I do not understand… if OpenLitespeed has LS Cache then WHY do they force WordPress sites to install a cache plugin? And if they want to compare with Nginx than WHY do they include. ![]() Actually, I find it nicer because my WordPress plugins cannot secretly change my config settings.Īnd for Nginx we can simply enable FastCGI cache without installing additional software package, and no Wordpress cache plugin is required, another nice thing for me so that my customers are not messing with the caching settings all the time. Well I am using Nginx around 7 years already and NEVER saw any problem without. htaccess is “required” for WordPress functions. ![]() Litespeed is “faster” than Nginx and that. I have noticed across US and Europe WordPress communities there are some rumors getting popular recently, ex.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |